|
Freedom-Phobia and the Socialist Cult of Mass Murder
According to the dictionary a "phobia" is: "a persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation that leads to a compelling desire to avoid it." (dictionary.com).
"Islamophobia, for example, is a persistent, irrational fear of Islam that leads you to a compelling desire to avoid it." Very convenient, don't you think? Those that accuse you of being Islamophobic want you to believe that they think you are frightened by Islam, and frightened by it so much that you irationally desire to avoid it. So, in their eyes, you are looney.
And of course, because you think they think this, or because this positions you to think they are erroneously labelling you, you tend to want to convince them that you are not afraid of Islam: Which positions you as being afraid of Islam.
It's the same propaganda tool that is used when you are accused of being a racist. First there's the accusation that you are a racist. You are then put in the position of having to defend an absurd accusation. But it isn't just an accusation. Psychiatrists, psychologists, counselors have long known that if you saddle someone with an incorrect "diagnosis," that is, if you tell someone that what is wrong with him is that he hates his father, he then can then incorrectly assign that quality to himself and then work to try to correct somethng that does not exist.
And if you were to ask that "client" why he was acting in an inappropriate manner, as his demeanor might reveal, he would say, "because I hate my father." The counselee tries to fix a non-existent condition, and then, because the condition does not exist, fails at fixing it, and so goes into a decline.
The same is at work, when they accuse the Tea Party of being TERRORISTS. The accusation, first of all implies there is something wrong with you for being in the Tea Party. Next, that thing that is wrong with you is EXTREMELY wrong, because "you are a Terrorist." The impulse is to defend against the wrong diagnosis, and by protesting against it, it positions you to have to defend against being a Terrorist. That defensiveness implies there is something to defend against. At the very least, it makes you needlessly have to defend yourself.
There is a bit of sub-conscious or sub-liminal, or sub-awareness "conflict," which causes one to hesitate a bit, for the mind always attempts to reconcile illogics, and tends to fill in the gaps, where logic is missing.
But seen in the light of understanding, one can counter psy-ops, or propaganda meant to confuse and to position you so that you feel defensive.
This tactic also has as part of its premise, that there is an audience in which to position you (the accused) negatively. And it also assumes that you are sensitive to the viewpoint of that audience. In accusing you of being a terrorist, they "create" a slightly "sub-conscious" audience, a false audience, that they are saying to, "look at him, all of you, he is a terrorist and you must disapprove." In the mind of the accused that false audience is judging him or her for being a terrorist, and the accused now has to "prove" or at least feels compelled to prove, that he or she is not a terrorist.
The antidote, of course is the truth. With ISLAMOPHOBIA, as with HOMOPHOBIA, as with RACISM, or the accusation that you are a "terrorist," the aim is to position you so that you defend. And with a "phobia," the aim is to position you to be afraid, whether you are afraid or not. The accusers want you to withdraw, to be careful of, or to be cautious of, or withhold a counter-attack against the accuser. And from the evidence at hand, to a greater or lesser degree, it appears to work. There is an additional bonus to accusing people of Islamophobia, or any other such "phobia," because the phobia is packaged in negative terms..
It is a very clever use of a very ancient tool.
Those methods can be turned on the accusers, the propagandists
Liberals have no qualms about being Liberal. They flaunt it. So it is always useful to point out that the "right wing" nuts, they always poke fun at, are in effect "Liberals." The "Left" and "Right" political spectrum has, on the Left, the Socialist Communists, and on the right, the Socialist Nazis (fascists).
When they accuse you of being a fascist, or a Nazi, they are accusing you of being a Socialist, which you are not. Essentially those are two extremes of the same character. That Socialist spectrum (Left vs. Right) was a way for Socialists to position themselves as the "good" communists versus the "bad" Nazis, after World War II, since Hitler gave them such a bad name with the extermination of six million Jews.
This Socialist Cult has colonized this country and has nearly succeeded in supplanting the Judaeo-Christian culture, with its own atheistic Socialist cult, which intent is to eradicate the original culture through the infiltration and domination of the political, cultural, and social instittutions of the nation.
Like any colonizing force, it can be repelled and expelled.
It is difficult, at first, to expel or fight a non-military force, because there appears to not be someone there to oppose. But once it is recognized that it is an atheistic Cult, it and its influences can be identified and "extracted" from the culture.
It is therefore imperative to delcare someone who advances the theories, the programs, the politics of Socialism, as a Socialist and to expose them for belonging to a Cult that, among other things advances such things as mass murder.
To do this requires a bit of study, and to know what you are talking about, so that you can effectively confront these cult members, for they do not depend on reason for their beliefs. It does not take long, and most people are apalled that they have been hoodwinked by a Socialist Cult of Mass Murder.
In fact, if ever minorities wake up that their civil rights movements were hijacked by the very people that would limit their numbers if not outright murder them, there will be hell to pay. Why there is not a Conservative or Constitutionalist effort to inform or to sway minorities and to point out to them that their Civil Rights movements were just, but that they were hijacked by a Colonial power that uses them for political and economic benefit, is unfortunate.
Christians have never had as their purpose the murder of entire populations or groups. But the history of Socialism is replete with examples of mass murder. Yet THEY accuse Christians of being "terrorists."
It is time to shine the light of truth, where it needs to be shone, so that the criminal, Socialist Cult can be identified, exposed, and expelled.
In the meantime, when you are falsely accused, return the favor with the the Truth.
|
